- Waikato Home
- →
- Library Home
- →
- Research Commons
- →
- Law
- →
- Law Papers
- →
- Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Search
Search Results for Collection: Law Papers
-
(LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd, 2012)This article discusses Trade Marks, Fair Trading, Copyright & Patent Infringement cases(respectively): “Mars New Zealand Ltd v Heinz Watties Ltd” [2012, NZHC 591]; “GeoSmart Maps Ltd v GoSmart Foundation Ltd” [HC Auckland ... -
(LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd, 2012)This article discusses three trade mark cases: “Nutramarks, Inc v Nature’s Life NZ Ltd” [2012, NZHC 1134]; Le Cordon Bleu v Commissioner of Trade Marks” [2012, NZHC 724] and “Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v AFT ... -
(LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd, 2012)This article discusses Trade Marks cases(respectively): “Mars New Zealand Ltd v Roby Trustees Ltd” [HC Auckland CIV 2011-404-4613, 7 December 2011], “Fonterra Brands (Tip Top Investments) Ltd v Tip Top Restaurant Ltd” [HC ... -
(LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd, 2012)This article discusses Intellectual Property cases(respectively): “Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly & Co.” [2011, UKSC 51] and“Fonterra Brands (Tip Top Investments) Ltd v Tip Top Restaurant Ltd” [HC Wellington CIV ... -
(LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd, 2012)This article discusses the copyright infringement case of: “National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd” [2012, FCAFC 59]. -
(LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd, 2012)This article discusses the patent and copyright infringement cases (respectively) : “Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories Inc” [566 US __2012], and “Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd” [2012 HCA 16]. -
(2009)This was a Supreme Court decision on the availability of additional damages for copyright infringement where an account of profits has been awarded. -
(2009)Oraka Technologies Ltd v Geostel Vision Ltd (HO, Hamilton CIV 2005-419-809, 18 February 2009, AllanJ) This was a copyright case about asparagus grading equipment. -
(2008)This was a trade mark case in which the plaintiff, Portacom New Zealand Ltd, sought an interim injunction and orders requiring that the defendants remove "Port A Room" from all marketing materials and that any such branded ... -
(2009)This was an unsuccessful appeal from a decision of Winkelmann J in the High Court allowing registration by the respondent, Mr Sintes, of a trade mark containing the words "family search".