Academic publishing: A Faustian Bargain?
Samkin, G. (2011). Academic publishing: A Faustian Bargain? Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 5(1), 19-34.
Permanent Research Commons link: http://hdl.handle.net/10289/5270
This paper documents and shares our experience of navigating the journal-review process. By providing a personal account we aim to provide a piece that will resonate with those who have had similar experiences. We adopted a case-study approach using the reviews of the manuscript by two anonymous reviewers and the authors' responses. The paper confirms the emotive nature of the manuscript-review process and details some of the vagaries associated with the review process, highlighting our frustrations with it. An extensive literature critiquing the manuscript peer-review process exists. This is understandable given the requirement for academics to publish their research findings in peer-reviewed journals. In view of this extensive literature, what is surprising is the dearth of studies detailing how authors have managed to navigate their way through the process.
University of Wollongong
- Management Papers