Research Commons

Evaluating research - Peer review team assessment and journal-based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006

Research Commons

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Anderson, David L.
dc.contributor.author Smart, Warren
dc.contributor.author Tressler, John
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-09T03:05:36Z
dc.date.available 2012-10-09T03:05:36Z
dc.date.issued 2012-04
dc.identifier.citation Anderson, D.L, Smart, W. & Tressler, J. (2012). Evaluating research - Peer review team assessment and journal-based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006. (Working Paper Series, Number 03/12). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato. en_NZ
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10289/6697
dc.description.abstract This paper concerns the relationship between the assessment of the research of individual academics by peer or expert review teams with a variety of bibliometric schemes based on journal quality weights. Specifically, for a common group of economists from New Zealand departments of economics the relationship between Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Research Output measures for those submitting new research portfolios in 2006 are compared with evaluations of journal based research over the 2000-2005 assessment period. This comparison identifies the journal weighting schemes that appear most similar to PBRF peer evaluations. The paper provides an indication of the ‘power or aggressiveness’ of PBRF evaluations in terms of the weighting given to quality. The implied views of PBRF peer review teams are also useful in assessing common assumptions made in evaluating journal based research. en_NZ
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher University of Waikato en_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofseries Department of Economics Working Paper Series
dc.rights ©2012 The Authors en_NZ
dc.subject Bibliometrics en_NZ
dc.subject Journal weighting schemes en_NZ
dc.subject PBRF en_NZ
dc.subject Research measurement en_NZ
dc.title Evaluating research - Peer review team assessment and journal-based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006 en_NZ
dc.type Working Paper en_NZ
uow.relation.series 03/12


Full-text options:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Research Commons


Advanced Search

Browse

Theses

About Research Commons

My Account

Usage Statistics

Share

  • Bookmark and Share