Suboptimal Choice Behaviour in Hens

Ngatai, Karmen Louise

Suboptimal Choice Behaviour in Hens

dc.contributor.advisor	Bizo, Lewis A.
dc.contributor.advisor	McEwan, James S.A.
dc.contributor.author	Ngatai, Karmen Louise
dc.date.accessioned	2014-08-01T02:56:34Z
dc.date.available	2014-08-01T02:56:34Z
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.date.updated	2013-12-13T02:07:55Z
dc.description.abstract	Choice performances of six Brown Shaver hens were studied across three series of conditions, using a partial replication of Stagner and Zentall’s (2010) procedure. Hens chose between two alternatives during choice-trials. Choice of the low-probability alternative provided one of two stimuli that reliably predicted 100% reinforcement on 20% of the trials, and 0% reinforcement on the remaining 80% of trials. Choice of the non-discriminative alternative provided one of two unreliable stimuli that non-differentially signalled 50% reinforcement, regardless of the stimulus presented. In Conditions 1-4 and Condition 6, the stimuli and reinforcement contingencies associated with the side keys were repeatedly reversed across conditions. In Condition 5, stimulus and reinforcement contingencies were each equated at 50%. Results replicated Stagner and Zentall’s (2010) findings demonstrating that choice for the low-probability alternative for most hens remained almost exclusive across reversals, except Condition 5 where previous choice performances for all subjects, was disrupted. In Conditions 7-11, the reliability of the low-probability stimuli was gradually decreased across conditions. Results showed that the decreasing reliability of the low-probability stimuli did not deter many hens from choosing suboptimally. Conditions 12 and 13 reversed Conditions 8 and 11, respectively. Results showed that choice performances for most hens in Condition 13 varied considerably from Condition 11. The main finding from this study is that hens do not exclusively choose signals that reliably signal a reinforcing outcome. This is because choice for the low-probability alternative for many hens was not affected when the reliability of those signals decreased. This suggests that the signals themselves may be more reinforcing than their subsequent outcome which may have implications for human gambling behaviour.
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype	application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
dc.format.mimetype	application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation	Ngatai, K. L. (2013). Suboptimal Choice Behaviour in Hens (Thesis, Master of Applied Psychology (MAppPsy)). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8714	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8714
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	University of Waikato
dc.rights	All items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject	Suboptimal Choice
dc.title	Suboptimal Choice Behaviour in Hens
dc.type	Thesis
pubs.place-of-publication	Hamilton, New Zealand	en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor	University of Waikato
thesis.degree.level	Masters
thesis.degree.name	Master of Applied Psychology (MAppPsy)