Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      One size does not fit all: Organisational diversity in New Zealand tertiary sector ethics committees

      Tolich, M.; Bathurst, R.; Deckert, A.; Flanagan, Paul G.; Gremillion, H.; Grimshaw, M.
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Kotuitui Final Resubmit.pdf
      Submitted version, 192.0Kb
      DOI
       10.1080/1177083X.2015.1035732
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Tolich, M., Bathurst, R., Deckert, A., Flanagan, P., Gremillion, H., & Grimshaw, M. (2015). One size does not fit all: Organisational diversity in New Zealand tertiary sector ethics committees. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2015.1035732
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10920
      Abstract
      New Zealand tertiary ethics committees may work from similar ethical principles but this article demonstrates that the way in which they operate is idiosyncratic. The paper builds on commentaries offered by current or former members of five New Zealand ethics committees on the organisation and practices of their committees. It examines differences among the committees with the aim of initiating an ongoing conversation about the work of ethics committees in the New Zealand context. It argues for the merits of diversity, transparency and openness as core principles for the work of ethics committees and as a platform for dealing with critique.
      Date
      2015
      Type
      Journal Article
      Rights
      This is an author’s accepted version of an article published in the journal: Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. © 2015 Taylor & Francis.
      Collections
      • Education Papers [1408]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      97
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement