Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez-Jimenez, Albertoen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-14T04:48:19Z
dc.date.available2017-07-01en_NZ
dc.date.available2017-08-14T04:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2017en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationAlvarez-Jimenez, A. (2017). The international law gaze: Marshall Island v United Kingdom. New Zealand Law Journal, July 2017, 222–226.en
dc.identifier.issn0028-8373en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/11280
dc.description.abstractThe International Court of Justice recently bowed to nuclear weapons States and disappointed the rest of the international community. Forty-two years after the Court’s astonishing decision in declaring the dispute on nuclear tests between New Zealand and France terminated (Nuclear Test Case (New Zealand v. France), [1974] I.C.J. Rep. 458, at [54]), a new chapter on the reluctance of the Court to deal with nuclear weapons took place in its judgment of 5 October 2016 on Preliminary Objections in Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v United Kingdom). There, the Court declared that it lacked jurisdiction, since there was no dispute between the parties. (Marshall Islands v UK, at [59]).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis is the author's accepted version. A later version of this article was published in the New Zealand Law Journal [2017] NZLJ 222, published by LexisNexis.
dc.titleThe international law gaze: Marshall Island v United Kingdomen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Law Journalen_NZ
pubs.begin-page222
pubs.elements-id200356
pubs.end-page226
pubs.volumeJuly 2017en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record