Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorToki, Valmaineen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-16T03:06:44Z
dc.date.available2017-06-20en_NZ
dc.date.available2017-08-16T03:06:44Z
dc.date.issued2017en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationToki, V. (2017). Legal responses to mental health: Is therapeutic jurisprudence the answer – the experience in New Zealand. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 10, 1–18.en
dc.identifier.issn1916-2405en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/11281
dc.description.abstractThe orthodox understanding of ‘ethics’ encompasses a system of moral principles that define good and bad behavior. When applied to mental health, various jurisdictions, including New Zealand, have codified these principles together with the obligations on health service providers to meet these codified principles and standards. Underpinning this relationship is one of mutual trust where the physician has a responsibility, for example, to secure informed consent prior to any treatment. The existence of this therapeutic relationship can be applied when an offender who presents with a mental illness is subject to the criminal justice system.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jemh.ca/
dc.rights© 2017 Journal of Ethics in Mental Health
dc.titleLegal responses to mental health: Is therapeutic jurisprudence the answer – the experience in New Zealanden_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Ethics in Mental Healthen_NZ
pubs.begin-page1
pubs.elements-id200940
pubs.end-page18
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://www.jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/JEMH%20article%20law%20theme%203%20final.pdfen_NZ
pubs.volume10en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record