Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Robert J.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Kevin J.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorAdamowicz, Wiktor (Vic)en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Jeffen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, Royen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Trudy Annen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorHanemann, W. Michaelen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorHanley, Nicken_NZ
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Mandyen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorScarpa, Riccardoen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorTourangeau, Rogeren_NZ
dc.contributor.authorVossler, Christian A.en_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T02:41:50Z
dc.date.available2017en_NZ
dc.date.available2018-05-15T02:41:50Z
dc.date.issued2017en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationJohnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W. (Vic), Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., … Vossler, C. A. (2017). Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697en
dc.identifier.issn2333-5955en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/11832
dc.description.abstractThis article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain, including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Press Journalsen_NZ
dc.rightsThis is an author’s accepted version of an article published in the Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. © 2017 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
dc.subjectChoice experiment
dc.subjectChoice modelling
dc.subjectContingent valuation
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectNonmarket valuation
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectStated preference
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.subjectWelfare
dc.titleContemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studiesen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/691697en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economistsen_NZ
pubs.begin-page319
pubs.elements-id201326
pubs.end-page405
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/jaere/2017/4/2en_NZ
pubs.volume4en_NZ
dc.identifier.eissn2333-5963en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record