Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorGurulian, Iakovosen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorMarkantonakis, Konstantinosen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Carltonen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Eibeen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorAkram, Raja Naeemen_NZ
dc.contributor.editorFarshim, P.en_NZ
dc.contributor.editorSimion, E.en_NZ
dc.coverage.spatialBucharest, Romaniaen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T23:07:12Z
dc.date.available2017en_NZ
dc.date.available2019-01-15T23:07:12Z
dc.date.issued2017en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationGurulian I., Markantonakis K., Shepherd C., Frank E., Akram R.N. (2017) Proximity Assurances Based on Natural and Artificial Ambient Environments. In: Farshim P., Simion E. (eds) Innovative Security Solutions for Information Technology and Communications. SecITC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10543. Springer, Cham
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-69284-5en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/12269
dc.description.abstractRelay attacks are passive man-in-the-middle attacks that aim to extend the physical distance of devices involved in a transaction beyond their operating environment. In the field of smart cards, distance bounding protocols have been proposed in order to counter relay attacks. For smartphones, meanwhile, the natural ambient environment surrounding the devices has been proposed as a potential Proximity and Relay-Attack Detection (PRAD) mechanism. These proposals, however, are not compliant with industry-imposed constraints that stipulate maximum transaction completion times, e.g. 500 ms for EMV contactless transactions. We evaluated the effectiveness of 17 ambient sensors that are widely-available in modern smartphones as a PRAD method for time-restricted contactless transactions. In our work, both similarity- and machine learning-based analyses demonstrated limited effectiveness of natural ambient sensing as a PRAD mechanism under the operating requirements for proximity and transaction duration specified by EMV and ITSO. To address this, we propose the generation of an Artificial Ambient Environment (AAE) as a robust alternative for an effective PRAD. The use of infrared light as a potential PRAD mechanism is evaluated, and our results indicate a high success rate while remaining compliant with industry requirements.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpingeren_NZ
dc.rights© 2017 Springer, Cham. This is the author's accepted version. The final publication is available at Springer via dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69284-5_7
dc.sourceSecITC 2017en_NZ
dc.subjectcomputer scienceen_NZ
dc.subjectmobile paymentsen_NZ
dc.subjectrelay attacksen_NZ
dc.subjectambient environment sensingen_NZ
dc.subjectcontactlessen_NZ
dc.subjectexperimental analysisen_NZ
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.titleProximity assurances based on natural and artificial ambient environmentsen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-69284-5_7en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfInnovative Security Solutions for Information Technology and Communications. SecITC 2017en_NZ
pubs.begin-page83
pubs.elements-id212094
pubs.end-page103
pubs.finish-date2017-06-09en_NZ
pubs.place-of-publicationCham, Switzerlanden_NZ
pubs.start-date2017-06-08en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record