dc.contributor.author | Alvarez-Jimenez, Alberto | en_NZ |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-26T23:50:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-01 | en_NZ |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-26T23:50:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.citation | Alvarez-Jimenez, A. (2018). The International Law Gaze: Allard v. Barbados. New Zealand Law Journal, 2018(November), 321–324. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10289/12431 | |
dc.description.abstract | What does it happen if as a result, among others, of an alleged State’s failure to enforce its environmental regulation, a foreign investor suffers significant losses due to the environmental deterioration provoked by the failure, argues that the failure constitutes a violation of its rights under an international investment agreement, and requests compensation from the host State? The award in Peter A. Allard v the Government of Barbados answers this and other related questions. (Peter A. Allard v the Government of Barbados, Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA Case No 2012-06, 27 June 2016) (Allard v Barbados). Although the investor lost the case, there are lessons to draw for environmental authorities and for New Zealand investors abroad. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | LexisNexis Nz Ltd | |
dc.rights | This is an author’s accepted version of an article published in the journal: New Zealand Law Journal. © 2018 LexisNexis NZ Ltd. Used with permission. | |
dc.title | The International Law Gaze: Allard v. Barbados | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.relation.isPartOf | New Zealand Law Journal | en_NZ |
pubs.begin-page | 321 | |
pubs.elements-id | 231312 | |
pubs.end-page | 324 | |
pubs.issue | November | en_NZ |
pubs.volume | 2018 | |