Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez-Jimenez, Albertoen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-01T23:41:14Z
dc.date.available2019-03-01en_NZ
dc.date.available2019-05-01T23:41:14Z
dc.date.issued2019en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationAlvarez-Jimenez, A. (2019). The international law gaze: subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in the interpretation of international treaties. New Zealand Law Journal, 2(March), 69–73.en
dc.identifier.issn0028-8373en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/12502
dc.description.abstractThe International Law Commission (ILC) recently examined in great detail the use of subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in the interpretation of international treaties. (70th Session – Subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties [2018]). Such use is often carried out by parties to treaties and by international courts and tribunals when settling disputes. Private actors and government officials should be aware of the ILC’s conclusions on this important topic. The report constitutes a valuable tool.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLexisNexis NZen_NZ
dc.rightsThis is an author’s accepted version of an article published in the journal: New Zealand Law Journal. Used with permission.
dc.titleThe international law gaze: subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in the interpretation of international treatiesen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Law Journalen_NZ
pubs.begin-page69
pubs.elements-id236069
pubs.end-page73
pubs.issueMarchen_NZ
pubs.volume2en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record