Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Ruthen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorvan Zyl, Liezlen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T02:15:47Z
dc.date.available2020en_NZ
dc.date.available2020-06-18T02:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2020en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationWalker, R., & van Zyl, L. (2020). Surrogacy and the law: three perspectives. New Zealand Family Law Journal, 10, 9–16.en
dc.identifier.issn1746-8000en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/13640
dc.description.abstractIn this article we argue that, from the perspective of the surrogacy triad, the legal process in New Zealand does not work well. We conducted semi-structured interviews with surrogates and intended parents about their experience of the New Zealand system and found several common themes, which we report here. Most legal professionals lack experience with surrogacy adoptions and do not always provide accurate advice, which leads to additional cost and stress for the intended parents in particular. A large part of the problem is that the legislation itself is not fit for purpose and forces the triad into a Family Court procedure that is antithetical to the intentions of all members. ECART plays a valuable role in facilitating domestic surrogacies and we argue for it to be expanded to include all traditional surrogacies and to be the only port of call for the triad to establish the intended parents as the legal parents of the baby from birth.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLexisNexis NZ Ltden_NZ
dc.rightsThis is an author's accepted version of an article published in New Zealand Family Law Journal. ©2020 LexisNexis NZ Ltd.
dc.titleSurrogacy and the law: three perspectivesen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Family Law Journalen_NZ
pubs.begin-page9
pubs.elements-id253558
pubs.end-page16
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.volume10en_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record