Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorLane, Joseph R.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Graham C.en_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-13T23:13:32Z
dc.date.available2020-09-13T23:13:32Z
dc.date.issued2020en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationLane, J. R., & Saunders, G. C. (2020). Theoretical study of the structures of 4-(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide and tris(pentafluorophenyl)phosphine oxide: Why does the crystal structure of (tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide have two different P=O bond lengths? Molecules, 25(12), 2778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122778en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/13821
dc.description.abstractThe crystal structure of 4-(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (1) contains two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Although the molecules are virtually identical in all other aspects, the P=O bond distances differ by ca. 0.02 Å. In contrast, although tris(pentafluorophenyl)phosphine oxide (2) has a similar crystal structure, the P=O bond distances of the two independent molecules are identical. To investigate the reason for the difference, a density functional theory study was undertaken. Both structures comprise chains of molecules. The attraction between molecules of 1, which comprises lone pair–π, weak hydrogen bonding and C–H···arene interactions, has energies of 70 and 71 kJ mol⁻¹. The attraction between molecules of 2 comprises two lone pair–π interactions, and has energies of 99 and 100 kJ mol−1. There is weak hydrogen bonding between molecules of adjacent chains involving the oxygen atom of 1. For one molecule, this interaction is with a symmetry independent molecule, whereas for the other, it also occurs with a symmetry related molecule. This provides a reason for the difference in P=O distance. This interaction is not possible for 2, and so there is no difference between the P=O distances of 2.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherMDPIen_NZ
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_NZ
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_NZ
dc.subjectPhysical Sciencesen_NZ
dc.subjectBiochemistry & Molecular Biologyen_NZ
dc.subjectChemistry, Multidisciplinaryen_NZ
dc.subjectChemistryen_NZ
dc.subjectphosphine oxidesen_NZ
dc.subjectX-ray crystal structureen_NZ
dc.subjectdensity functional theory calculationsen_NZ
dc.subjectHYDROGEN-BONDen_NZ
dc.subjectLIGANDSen_NZ
dc.subjectCOBALTen_NZ
dc.subjectPAIRen_NZ
dc.titleTheoretical study of the structures of 4-(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide and tris(pentafluorophenyl)phosphine oxide: Why does the crystal structure of (tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide have two different P=O bond lengths?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/molecules25122778en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfMoleculesen_NZ
pubs.elements-id254910
pubs.issue12en_NZ
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.volume25en_NZ
dc.identifier.eissn1420-3049en_NZ
uow.identifier.article-noARTN 2778


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record