Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.advisorIsler, Robert B.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Eryn
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T01:45:03Z
dc.date.available2021-05-04T01:45:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, E. (2021). The effects of vulnerabilities and strengths on the outcomes of a chronic pain management programme (Thesis, Master of Social Sciences (MSocSc)). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/14272en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/14272
dc.description.abstractChronic pain is a problem that affects around one million New Zealanders and is very difficult to treat effectively. Most pain management programmes focus on decreasing levels of treatment outcome measures (pain catastrophising, pain intensity, interference) and increasing levels of pain self-efficacy. Research shows that higher levels of vulnerabilities (depression, anxiety, stress, pessimism) can negatively impact treatment outcomes. However, research also shows that increasing levels of strengths (optimism, hope, spirituality, social support, grit) affect treatment outcomes positively. We wanted to determine if there were differences in treatment outcomes for participants with high levels of vulnerabilities or strengths. Our study looked at the relationships between treatment outcome measures, vulnerabilities, and strengths over a three-week pain management programme. Participants (N = 40) attending the ReCharge Programme at QE Health completed repeat measure scales at intake, discharge, and 12-week follow-up. We found that higher levels of depression, stress, and pessimism were associated with higher levels of pain catastrophising, pain intensity, and interference, and lower levels of pain self-efficacy. Conversely, higher levels of optimism, hope, spirituality, and grit were associated with lower levels catastrophising, intensity, and interference, and higher levels of pain self-efficacy. Anxiety and social support were not associated with any treatment outcomes. We also found that correlations of composite measures of strengths accounted for more variability in pain self-efficacy than did composite vulnerabilities. This suggests that tailored interventions, based on levels of strengths at intake, aimed at increasing levels of strengths during the ReCharge Programme could improve treatment outcome measures for clients.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Waikato
dc.rightsAll items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectchronic pain
dc.subjectpain management
dc.subjectoptimism
dc.subjecthope
dc.subjectsocial support
dc.subjectgrit
dc.subjectspirituality
dc.titleThe effects of vulnerabilities and strengths on the outcomes of a chronic pain management programme
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Waikato
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Social Sciences (MSocSc)
dc.date.updated2021-05-02T20:45:35Z
pubs.place-of-publicationHamilton, New Zealanden_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record