Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorHaring, Rodney C.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, Jessica W.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorKorchmaros, Josephine D.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLund, Justin R.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorHaozous, Emily A.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorRaphaelito, Josieen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Mauien_NZ
dc.contributor.authorTsosie, Krystal S.en_NZ
dc.coverage.spatialSwitzerlanden_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T19:48:19Z
dc.date.available2022-02-17T19:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2021en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/14751
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has inequitably impacted Indigenous communities in the United States. In this emergency state that highlighted existing inadequacies in US government and tribal public health infrastructures, many tribal nations contracted with commercial entities and other organization types to conduct rapid diagnostic and antibody testing, often based on proprietary technologies specific to the novel pathogen. They also partnered with public-private enterprises on clinical trials to further the development of vaccines. Indigenous people contributed biological samples for assessment and, in many cases, broadly consented for indefinite use for future genomics research. A concern is that the need for crisis aid may have placed Indigenous communities in a position to forego critical review of data use agreements by tribal research governances. In effect, tribal nations were placed in the unenviable position of trading short-term public health assistance for long-term, unrestricted access to Indigenous genomes that may disempower future tribal sovereignties over community members' data. Diagnostic testing, specimen collection, and vaccine research is ongoing; thus, our aim is to outline pathways to trust that center current and future equitable relationship-building between tribal entities and public-private interests. These pathways can be utilized to increase Indigenous communities' trust of external partners and share understanding of expectations for and execution of data protections. We discuss how to navigate genomic-based data use agreements in the context of pathogen genomics. While we focus on US tribal nations, Indigenous genomic data sovereignties relate to global Indigenous nations regardless of colonial government recognition.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.rights© 2021 Haring, Blanchard, Korchmaros, Lund, Haozous, Raphaelito, Hudson and Tsosie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.subjectAmerican Indian/Alaska Nativeen_NZ
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_NZ
dc.subjectIndigenousen_NZ
dc.subjectIndigenous data sovereigntyen_NZ
dc.subjectbroad consenten_NZ
dc.subjectdata use agreementsen_NZ
dc.subjectgenomicsen_NZ
dc.subjectvaccine researchen_NZ
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_NZ
dc.subjectGenomicsen_NZ
dc.subjectHumansen_NZ
dc.subjectPandemicsen_NZ
dc.subjectPower, Psychologicalen_NZ
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2en_NZ
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_NZ
dc.titleEmpowering equitable data use partnerships and indigenous data sovereignties amid pandemic genomicsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2021.742467en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfFront Public Healthen_NZ
pubs.begin-page742467
pubs.elements-id265380
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_NZ
pubs.volume9en_NZ
dc.identifier.eissn2296-2565en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record