Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

Purpose of weed harvesting

Abstract
Harvesting is one potential option to control nuisance growths of lake weeds. Mechanical harvester units can typically remove lake weed to 2-3m below the water surface. Yet common weed species in NZ lakes often grow to deeper depths, so typically only the upper canopy of large weed beds can be removed with this technique. Nevertheless, harvesting can be a useful tool to reduce weed abundance in sensitive areas (e.g. boat ramps, beaches), or from areas where it is likely to detach and form drifting rafts that interfere with various recreational or commercial interests. It is not a suitable option for weed control in areas where weed fragments generated by the harvesting activity pose a biosecurity risk. For example, in areas where an infestation of a new weed has been found or the weed has a limited distribution within the lake. Most New Zealand lake weed species can grow vegetatively from fragments broken off the main weed bed. Even small fragments (<1-2cm length) can remain viable for long periods of time if kept wet. In areas where harvesting units can operate efficiently (e.g. sheltered sites without underwater obstacles), large quantities of weed can conceivably be removed which may benefit lake water quality or offset nutrient inputs from the catchment through removal of nutrients that have been assimilated into the plants as they grow. However, potential downsides of harvesting, particularly where it is done on a large scale, include the kill of fish and other biota trapped in the weed bed at the time of harvest, removal of habitat and flipping of the lake ecosystem to an algal dominated state. Disposal of harvested weed can also be problematic. Lake weeds often bioaccumulate contaminants (e.g. arsenic) that render them unsuitable for use as a compost or stock feed. In lake disposal via pulverizing and/or deep water discharge of negatively buoyant material is a much cheaper option than ferrying harvested weed to shore for transport to an onshore disposal site but is not a suitable option for situations where removal of lake nutrients assimilated into weed is desired. A final consideration is the movement of harvester units between lakes or other waterbodies and any potential biosecurity risks that this raises. A number of New Zealand’s worst lake weeds (e.g. hornwort) currently have a limited distribution so ensuring that fragments of such weeds are not inadvertently introduced into a new location by a harvesting unit is paramount. Units must be thoroughly decontaminated before being moved.
Type
Conference Contribution
Type of thesis
Series
Proceedings of LakesWater Quality Society 2015
Citation
Date
2015
Publisher
LakesWater Quality Society
Degree
Supervisors
Rights
© 2015 LakesWater Quality Society.