Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Health, Sport and Human Performance
      • Health, Sport and Human Performance Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Health, Sport and Human Performance
      • Health, Sport and Human Performance Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Non-South East Asians have a better running economy and different anthropometrics and biomechanics than South East Asians

      Patoz, Aurélien; Lussiana, T; Breine, Bastiaan; Gindre, Cyrille; Mourot, Laurent; Hébert-Losier, Kim
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Non-South East Asians have a better running economy and different anthropometrics and biomechanics than South East Asians.pdf
      Published version, 1.985Mb
      DOI
       10.1038/s41598-022-10030-4
      Find in your library  
      Permanent link to Research Commons version
      https://hdl.handle.net/10289/15530
      Abstract
      Running biomechanics and ethnicity can influence running economy (RE), which is a critical factor of running performance. Our aim was to compare RE of South East Asian (SEA) and non‑South East Asian (non‑SEA) runners at several endurance running speeds (10–14 km/h) matched for on‑road racing performance and sex. Secondly, we explored anthropometric characteristics and relationships between RE and anthropometric and biomechanical variables. SEA were 6% less economical (p = 0.04) than non‑SEA. SEA were lighter and shorter than non‑SEA, and had lower body mass indexes and leg lengths (p ≤ 0.01). In terms of biomechanics, a higher prevalence of forefoot strikers in SEA than non‑SEA was seen at each speed tested (p ≤ 0.04). Furthermore, SEA had a significantly higher step frequency (p = 0.02), shorter contact time (p = 0.04), smaller footstrike angle (p < 0.001), and less knee extension at toe‑off (p = 0.03) than non‑SEA. Amongst these variables, only mass was positively correlated to RE for both SEA (12 km/h) and non‑SEA (all speeds); step frequency, negatively correlated to RE for both SEA (10 km/h) and non‑SEA (12 km/h); and contact time, positively correlated to RE for SEA (12 km/h). Despite the observed anthropometric and biomechanical differences between cohorts, these data were limited in underpinning the observed RE differences at a group level. This exploratory study provides preliminary indications of potential differences between SEA and non‑SEA runners warranting further consideration. Altogether, these findings suggest caution when generalizing from non‑SEA running studies to SEA runners.
      Date
      2022-04-15
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      NATURE PORTFOLIO
      Rights
      © 2022. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license.
      Collections
      • Health, Sport and Human Performance Papers [168]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      26
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement