Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorEdgar, David Thomasen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBeaven, Christopher Martynen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorGill, Nicholas D.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorZaslona, Jennifer L.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorDriller, Matthew W.en_NZ
dc.coverage.spatialGermanyen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-09T20:32:25Z
dc.date.available2023-10-09T20:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2023-06en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn1984-0659en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/16070
dc.description.abstractIntroduction  Actigraphy has been used widely in sleep research due to its non-invasive, cost-effective ability to monitor sleep. Traditionally, manually-scored actigraphy has been deemed the most appropriate in the research setting; however, technological advances have seen the emergence of automatic-scoring wearable devices and software. Methods  A total of 60-nights of sleep data from 20-healthy adult participants (10 male, 10 female, age: 26 ± 10 years) were collected while wearing two devices concomitantly. The objective was to compare an automatic-scoring device (Fatigue Science Readiband™ [AUTO]) and a manually-scored device (Micro Motionlogger® [MAN]) based on the Cole-Kripke method. Manual-scoring involved trained technicians scoring all 60-nights of sleep data. Sleep indices including total sleep time (TST), total time in bed (TIB), sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep efficiency (SE), wake after sleep onset (WASO), wake episodes per night (WE), sleep onset time (SOT) and wake time (WT) were assessed between the two devices using mean differences, 95% levels of agreement, Pearson-correlation coefficients ( r ), and typical error of measurement (TEM) analysis. Results  There were no significant differences between devices for any of the measured sleep variables ( p  ≥0.05). All sleep indices resulted in very-strong correlations ( all r  ≥0.84) between devices. A mean difference between devices of <1 minutes for TST was associated with a TEM of 15.5 minute (95% CI =12.3 to 17.7 minutes). Conclusion  Given there were no significant differences between devices in the current study, automatic-scoring actigraphy devices may provide a more practical and cost-effective alternative to manually-scored actigraphy in healthy populations.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_NZ
dc.publisherThieme
dc.rights© 2023.Brazilian Sleep Association. This is an open-access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License,
dc.subjectMonitoringen_NZ
dc.subjectPolysomnographyen_NZ
dc.subjectReproducibility of resultsen_NZ
dc.subjectSleep deprivationen_NZ
dc.subjectTechnologyen_NZ
dc.titleAutomatic-Scoring Actigraph Compares Favourably to a Manually-Scored Actigraph for Sleep Measurement in Healthy Adults.en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0043-1770809en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfSleep Scien_NZ
pubs.begin-page159
pubs.elements-id324478
pubs.end-page164
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_NZ
pubs.volume16en_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record