Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorFazekas, Mihályen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorHellmann, Ollien_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-20T21:19:30Z
dc.date.available2023-11-20T21:19:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn0039-3606en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/16179
dc.description.abstractBy now, most political systems around the world hold regular multiparty elections of different quality and type. However, we know relatively little about the effect of elections on corruption, especially in high-discretion, public procurement contracts implementing development aid. To address this gap in the literature, we employ unmatched comparisons and matching estimators to analyze a global government contracting dataset that provides an objective proxy for corruption: the incidence of single bidding in competitive markets. We find that, all things being equal, corruption risks increase in the immediate pre-election period: single bidding is higher by 1.3–6.1% points. We demonstrate that the corruption-enhancing effect of elections is stronger under conditions of (i) high electoral competitiveness, (ii) medium-level party institutionalization, and (iii) “localized collective goods” clientelism.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rights© 2023. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
dc.titleElections and Corruption: Incentives to Steal or Incentives to Invest?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12116-023-09412-0en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfStudies in Comparative International Developmenten_NZ
pubs.elements-id329633
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
dc.identifier.eissn1936-6167en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record