Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorCollier, Kevin J.
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-03T00:38:28Z
dc.date.available2009-08-03T00:38:28Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationCollier, K. J. (2008). Average score per metric: an alternative metric aggregation method for assessing wadeable stream health. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 42(4), 367- 378.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/2728
dc.description.abstractIntegrating multiple metrics derived from stream macroinvertebrate communities into single scores that reflect ecological condition can bridge the needs of multiple groups using biomonitoring data. Macroinvertebrate metrics from 511 Waikato, New Zealand, stream samples were standardised by their maximum observed value. Metric redundancy and optimisation processes identified three standardised metrics from an initial set of 17 that provided greatest discrimination between reference sites and those influenced by urbanisation or high levels of pastoral development: the richness of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera excluding Hydroptilidae (EPT*), % EPT* and the macroinvertebrate community index (MCI). The mean of these standardised metrics was used to calculate the average score per metric (ASPM). Narrative condition bands were developed based on the lower SD of individual metrics for reference samples to distinguish “very high” values, and metric quartiles between this point and a hypothetical worst-case community were used to define “high”, “moderate”, “low”, and “very low” bands. When compared with its component metrics, the ASPM distinguished reference conditions and low–moderate levels of catchment modification and local habitat degradation more accurately than EPT* richness or MCI, and displayed lower temporal variability within reference sites than either EPT* metric. The ASPM was calculated for an independent test data set of urban and reference sites which, respectively, were allocated to low–very low and high–very high narrative condition bands. This analysis suggests that prudent application of the ASPM can provide a parsimonious and effective screening tool for assessing the condition of wadeable streams where more complex methods are not practical.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherR S N Z Publishingen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.royalsociety.org.nz/Site/publish/Journals/nzjmfr/2008/034.aspxen
dc.subjectmacroinvertebrateen
dc.subjectbioassessmenten
dc.subjectbiomonitoringen
dc.subjectWaikatoen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.titleAverage score per metric: an alternative metric aggregation method for assessing wadeable stream healthen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00288330809509965en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Researchen_NZ
pubs.begin-page367en_NZ
pubs.elements-id33545
pubs.end-page378en_NZ
pubs.issue4en_NZ
pubs.volume42en_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record