Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Problems with the census conception of ethnic group: an anthropological perspective

      Barber, Keith
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Problems with the census conception.pdf
      193.5Kb
      Link
       sites.otago.ac.nz
      Citation
      Export citation
      Barber, K. (2004). Problems with the census conception of ethnic group: an anthropological perspective. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology & Cultural Studies, 1(2), 12-24.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/3473
      Abstract
      From the perspective of social anthropology, this paper examines the collection and analysis of census data on ethnic group membership. It identifies a fundamental problem lying in the census's attempt to enumerate a subjective identity. The problem is seen as exacerbated by allowing census respondents to report membership in more than one ethnic group. This not only contradicts the census's own definition of ethnic group, and steers respondents toward a racial conception of ethnicity, but involves the census in the arbitrary re-allocation of respondent's answers. The paper then reviews two influential social science analyses of census data on ethnic group membership and finds that the analysts concerned impose their own quite different definitions of ethnic groups onto the data. It is concluded that the whole process of collecting and analysing census data of ethnic group membership is subjective and arbitrary from start to finish.
      Date
      2004
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Association of Social Anthropologists of Aotearoa New Zealand
      Rights
      This article has been published in the journal: Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology & Cultural Studies. Used with permission.
      Collections
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers [1424]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      27
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement