Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorFoster, T. Mary
dc.contributor.authorSumpter, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.authorTemple, William
dc.contributor.authorFlevill, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorPoling, Alan
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Statesen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-06T02:20:47Z
dc.date.available2010-07-06T02:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationFoster, T.M., Sumpter, C.E., Temple, W., Flevill, A. & Poling, A. (2009). Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratioschedules: a comparison of three data conversions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92(3), 305-326.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/4101
dc.description.abstractConcurrent schedules were used to establish 6 hens’ preferences for three foods. The resulting biases suggested wheat was preferred over honey-puffed and puffed wheat, and puffed wheat was the least preferred food. The hens then responded under fixed-ratio schedules for each food in 40-min (excluding reinforcer time) sessions, with the response requirement doubling each session until no reinforcers were received. At the smaller ratios, the less preferred the food, the faster the hens’ overall response rates (mainly as a result of shorter postreinforcement pauses) and the more reinforcers they received. The relations between the logarithms of the number of reinforcers obtained (consumption) and the response ratio (price) were well fitted by curvilinear demand functions. Wheat produced the smallest initial consumption (ln L), followed by honey-puffed and puffed wheat, respectively. The response requirement at which the demand functions predicted maximal responding (Pmax) were larger for wheat than for the other foods. Normalizing consumption and price, as suggested by Hursh and Winger (1995), moved the data for the three foods towards a single demand function; however, the Pmax values were generally largest for puffed wheat. The results of normalization, as suggested by Hursh and Silberberg (2008), depended on the k value used. The parameter k is related to the range of the data, and the same k value needs to be used for all data sets that are compared. A k value of 8.0 gave significantly higher essential values (smaller a values) for puffed wheat as compared to honey-puffed wheat and wheat, and the Pmax values, in normalized standard price units, were largest for puffed wheat. Normalizing demand by converting the puffed and honey-puffed wheat reinforcers to wheat equivalents (by applying the bias parameter from the concurrent-schedules procedure) maintained separate demand functions for the foods. Those for wheat had the smallest rates of change in elasticity (a) and, in contrast to the other analyses, the largest Pmax values. Normalizing demand in terms of concurrentschedule preference appears to have some advantages and to merit further investigation.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/en_NZ
dc.rightsThis article has been published in the journal: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. © Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 2009 Used with permission.en_NZ
dc.subjectfixed-ratio schedulesen_NZ
dc.subjectreinforcer qualityen_NZ
dc.subjectconcurrent schedulesen_NZ
dc.subjectbehavioral economicsen_NZ
dc.subjectdemand functionsen_NZ
dc.subjectnormalizationen_NZ
dc.subjectmagnitude-of-reinforceren_NZ
dc.subjectkey pecken_NZ
dc.subjectdomestic hensen_NZ
dc.titleDemand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratioschedules: a comparison of three data conversionsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1901/jeab.2009.92-305en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavioren_NZ
pubs.begin-page305en_NZ
pubs.elements-id35060
pubs.end-page326en_NZ
pubs.issue3en_NZ
pubs.volume92en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record