Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Shaping supervision practice through research: Effects of supervision for counselling practice

      Crocket, Kathie; Gaddis, Stephen; Day, Caroline; Flintoff, Vivianne; Lammers, Marianne; Malcolm, Pam; McLachlan, Debbie; Overdyck, Helga; Rewita, Titihuia; Riches, Val; Rodwell, Jan; Schoffelmeer, Ellie
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Shaping supervision.pdf
      166.3Kb
      Link
       www.nzac.org.nz
      Citation
      Export citation
      Crocket, K., Gaddis, S., Day, C., Flintoff, V., Lammers, M., …, Schoffelmeer, E.(2006). Shaping supervision practice through research: Effects of supervision for counselling practice. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 27(1), 55-69.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/4147
      Abstract
      That there are links between effective supervision and effective counselling practice tends to be taken for granted. As a contribution to documenting the professional knowledges and experiences that might stand behind the profession’s claims for the benefits of supervision, this study interviewed experienced supervisors, seeking their perspectives on the links between effective supervision and effective counselling practice. Taking a social constructionist approach and showing the processes of knowledge production, researchers then engaged with these supervisors’ perspectives, in a series of reflections. These reflections show how the research interviews contribute to shaping the researchers’ ongoing supervision practice. Areas of interest include the power relation between supervisor and practitioner; responsibilities for monitoring practice; taping; supervisor responsibility for evaluating the effectiveness of supervision, and generativity of practice through storying a practitioner’s values and principles. Questions are offered for readers, too, to engage in a shaping of practice through their own responses to the article.
      Date
      2007
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      New Zealand Association of Counsellors
      Rights
      This article has been published in New Zealand Journal of Counselling. © 2007 New Zealand Journal of Counselling. Used with permission.
      Collections
      • Education Papers [1439]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      392
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement