Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Science and Engineering
      • Science and Engineering Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Science and Engineering
      • Science and Engineering Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Nitrate removal from three different effluents using large-scale denitrification beds

      Schipper, Louis A.; Cameron, Stewart Graham; Warneke, Sören
      DOI
       10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.02.007
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Cameron, S.C., Schipper, L.A. & Warneke, S. (2010). Nitrate removal from three different effluents using large-scale denitrification beds . Ecological Engineering, 36(1), 1552-1557.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/4231
      Abstract
      Simple technologies that remove nitrate from effluents and other point discharges need to be developed to reduce pollution of receiving waters. Denitrification beds are lined containers filled with organic carbon (typically wood chip or coarse sawdust) and are a technology that is proving promising. Water containing NO₃⁻ (treated effluent or agricultural drainage) is passed through the bed and the wood chips act as an energy source for denitrifying bacteria that convert NO₃⁻ to N gases. There are few data on the efficiency of NO₃ removal in large-scale beds. We report here NO₃⁻ removal results from three large denitrification beds with volumes of 83, 294, and 1320 m³ treating dairy shed effluent, treated domestic effluent and glasshouse effluent, respectively. Nitrate was nearly completely removed from the dairy shed effluent (annual load of 31 kg N) and domestic effluent (annual load 365 kg N). In these beds, NO₃ removal, presumably by denitrification, was limited by NO₃⁻ concentration. However, the bed treating glasshouse effluent was overwhelmed by very high NO₃⁻ concentration (about 250 g N m⁻³) and high flow rates (about 150 m³ d⁻¹) but still reduced NO₃⁻ concentration to about 150 g N m⁻³. For this bed, long-term NO₃⁻ removal was between 5 and 10 g N m⁻³ of bed material when NO₃⁻ was non-limiting and was similar to rates reported for other smaller denitrification beds. As expected, organic N, ammonium and phosphorus were not removed from any of the effluents following passage through the beds. Our results suggest that denitrification beds are a relatively inexpensive system to construct and operate, and are suitable for final treatment of a range of NO₃⁻-laden effluents.
      Date
      2010
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Elsevier
      Collections
      • Science and Engineering Papers [3124]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement