Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorLonghurst, Robynen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-19T04:57:05Z
dc.date.available2007-03-14en_US
dc.date.available2008-03-19T04:57:05Z
dc.date.issued2002-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLonghurst, R. (2002). Geography and gender: feminist geography a critical time? Progress in Human Geography 26(4), 544-552.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/444
dc.description.abstractThe recent growth in critical geography suggests this may be a ‘critical’ time for raising issues about the intersections between feminist and critical geography. This is not the first time these issues have been aired. For example, the Women and Geography Study Group (1997: 49–85) questions whether feminist geographers ought always to accord primacy to gender as the central analytical category or whether there are instances where gender ought to be decentred and destabilized. My aim in this commentary is to (re)visit some of these arguments in relation to recently published feminist geographical research.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherArnolden_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://phg.sagepub.com/en_US
dc.subjectfeminist geography
dc.titleGeography and gender: feminist geography - a 'critical' time?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1191/0309132502ph385pren_US
dc.relation.isPartOfProgress in Human Geographyen_NZ
pubs.begin-page544en_NZ
pubs.elements-id27971
pubs.end-page552en_NZ
pubs.issue4en_NZ
pubs.volume26en_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record