Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorJackson, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Amina
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-28T01:29:53Z
dc.date.available2011-02-28T01:29:53Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationJackson, N. & Casey, A. (2009). Procreate and cherish: A note on Australia’s abrupt shift to Pro-Natalism. New Zealand Population Review, 35, 129-148.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/5107
dc.description.abstractAfter a long history of arguing that Australian governments do not intervene in the bedrooms of the nation, in 2004 the Howard Government did exactly that. Under the enthusiastic choreographing of then Treasurer Peter Costello, it implemented an explicit and indirect fertility policy in the form of a maternity payment, commonly known as the ‘Baby Bonus’. Rising fertility in Australia since that time has been widely claimed as evidence of the policy’s success. Hailed as a mini ‘baby boom’, Costello was moved to describe the policy as a shift from ‘population or perish’ to ‘procreate and cherish’. Despite arguing against it while in Opposition, the policy has been continued with only a few changes by the incumbent Rudd Government, seemingly on the grounds that it may indeed be responsible for the recent ‘nudging up’ of birth rates. This paper traces the policy shift and concludes with a brief analysis of Australian trends across the period of the Baby Bonus (2004-2008), showing that one quarter of the increase in numbers is due to cohort size, but noting that fertility has also risen in many developed countries across the same period and thus trends in Australia may just be part of a broader trend – and/or in part an artifact of the index used to measure fertility. It also draws attention to the collateral effect of an increased dependency ratio, with the mini ‘boom’ reaching school age at the very moment the post war baby boomers reach retirement age – as forewarned by Costello in 2002 when initially rejecting the idea of a Baby Bonus.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPopulation Association of New Zealanden_NZ
dc.rightsThis article has been published in the journal: New Zealand Population Review. © 2009 Population Association of New Zealand. Used with permission.en_NZ
dc.subjectAustraliaen_NZ
dc.subjectmaternity paymenten_NZ
dc.titleProcreate and cherish: A note on Australia’s abrupt shift to Pro-Natalismen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Population Reviewen_NZ
pubs.begin-page129en_NZ
pubs.elements-id35602
pubs.end-page148en_NZ
pubs.volume35en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record