dc.contributor.author | Boer, Douglas Pieter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-03T21:44:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-03T21:44:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Boer, D.P. (2002). A classic case of test envy in sex offender risk assessment. Crime Scene, 9(2), 5-8. | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10289/5444 | |
dc.description.abstract | The SORAG, SVR-20, VRS-S0, STATIC99, SONAR, STABLE (see below for references), and other relatively similar risk prediction tools (RSVPTs) are just a few of the currently available risk assessment measures designed for use with sexual offenders. These instruments all purport to do a similar job – providing estimates of likelihood to recidivate – and most of the associated authors claim that their test, or their type of test, does a better job at risk assessment than the competition. This same debate exists among the experts of risk assessment for non-sexual violent offenders and the discussion from this paper can be extended to risk assessment in general. | en_NZ |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | The Canadian Psychological Association | en_NZ |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Criminal%20Justice/Crime%20Scene%202002-04.PDF | en_NZ |
dc.subject | sex offender | en_NZ |
dc.title | A classic case of test envy in sex offender risk assessment | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_NZ |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Crime Scene | en_NZ |
pubs.begin-page | 5 | en_NZ |
pubs.edition | April | en_NZ |
pubs.elements-id | 31829 | |
pubs.end-page | 8 | en_NZ |
pubs.issue | 2 | en_NZ |
pubs.volume | 9 | en_NZ |