Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorGibson, John
dc.contributor.authorKim, Bonggeun
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-29T03:37:10Z
dc.date.available2012-10-29T03:37:10Z
dc.date.copyright2013-01
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationGibson, J., & Kim, B. (2013). How reliable are household expenditures as a proxy for permanent income? Implications for the income–nutrition relationship. Economics Letters, 118(1), 23-25.en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn01665-1765
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/6755
dc.description.abstractUsing short-run expenditures from household surveys as a proxy may create attenuated estimates of the impact of permanent income on economic outcomes. We use repeated observations to calculate reliability ratios and estimate errors in variables regressions of the impact of income on nutrition. We find significant responses to income, in contrast to previous influential studies.en_NZ
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevieren_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics Letters
dc.subjectIncomeen_NZ
dc.subjectmeasurement erroren_NZ
dc.subjectnutritionen_NZ
dc.titleHow reliable are household expenditures as a proxy for permanent income? Implications for the income–nutrition relationshipen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.016en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfEconomics Lettersen_NZ
pubs.begin-page23en_NZ
pubs.elements-id38071
pubs.end-page25en_NZ
pubs.issue1en_NZ
pubs.volume118en_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record