Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Determinants of cost-effectiveness in tender and offset programmes for Australian biodiversity conservation

      Doole, Graeme J.; Blackmore, Tania Louise; Schilizzi, Steven
      DOI
       10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.023
      Link
       www.sciencedirect.com
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Doole, G. J., Blackmore, L., & Schilizzi, S. (2014). Determinants of cost-effectiveness in tender and offset programmes for Australian biodiversity conservation. Land Use Policy, 36, 23-32.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8141
      Abstract
      Tender and offset programmes have been broadly applied for biodiversity conservation throughout Australia. This analysis identifies the relative importance of a range of factors that determine the overall cost-effectiveness of these programmes to guide future management, based on the perceptions of survey respondents with experience in their design and implementation. The novel method of maximum entropy regression for categorical response variables is used to analyse survey results. Key actions for tender programmes, in order of decreasing importance, are the: (a) provision of adequate funding, (b) development of flexible tender designs to aid organisational efficiency, (c) promotion of landholder competition, (d) identification of low-cost means of monitoring, and (e) establishment of strong relationships with landholders. In comparison, key actions for offset programmes, in decreasing order of importance, are the: (a) establishment of efficient organisational processes, (b) promotion of a short time lag between development and the restoration of ecological values, (c) employment of contracts of extended duration, (d) investment in landholder education and support, and (e) development of appropriate biophysical models.
      Date
      2014
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Elsevier
      Collections
      • Management Papers [1135]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement