dc.contributor.author | Havemann, Leo | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Conference held at Hamilton | en_NZ |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-17T22:45:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-17T22:45:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Havemann, L. (1999). Method or Madness? Textual analysis in media studies. Paper presented at the conference of the Australian & New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA), University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 7-9 July 1998. | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8180 | |
dc.description.abstract | Scholarly analyses of media have tended to view the media text (e.g. film / programme / article) as the logical site of enquiry. However, this focus on the text has often resulted in a privileging of the text as the locus of meaning. The validity of textual analysis as a research method has increasingly been called into question due to the influence of poststructuralist theories and the critique of textually-based research emerging from the ‘new audience studies’. In this paper I examine the debates surrounding texts, audiences and meanings from a poststructuralist perspective. I argue that the rethinking of subjectivity achieved by discourse theory provides the key to a new conception of textual analysis, which remains a vital and rewarding approach to the study of media and culture. | en_NZ |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_NZ |
dc.source | AANZCA Shifting disciplines: Communication, Discourses and Identities | en_NZ |
dc.title | Method or Madness? Textual analysis in media studies | en_NZ |
dc.type | Conference Contribution | en_NZ |
pubs.elements-id | 24818 | |
pubs.finish-date | 1998-07-09 | en_NZ |
pubs.start-date | 1998-07-07 | en_NZ |