Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Science and Engineering
      • Science and Engineering Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Science and Engineering
      • Science and Engineering Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Mapping and explaining the productivity of Pinus radiata in New Zealand

      Palmer, Jonathan G.; Watt, Michael S.; Kimberley, Mark O.; Hock, Barbara K.; Payn, Tim W.; Lowe, David J.
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Palmer et al. 2010.pdf
      Published version, 11.36Mb
      Link
       www.nzjf.org
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Palmer, J. G., Watt, M. S., Kimberley, M. O., Hock, B. K., Payn, T. W., & Lowe, D. J. (2010). Mapping and explaining the productivity of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry, 55(1), 15–21.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8862
      Abstract
      Mapping Pinus radiata productivity for New Zealand not only provides useful information for forest owners, industry stakeholders and policy managers, but also enables current and future plantations to be visualised, quantified, and planned. Using an extensive set of permanent sample plots, split into fitting (n = 1,146) and validation (n = 618) datasets, models of P. radiata 300 Index (an index of volume mean annual increment) and Site Index (an index of height growth) were developed using a regression kriging technique. Spatial predictions were accurate and accounted for 61% and 70% of the variance for 300 Index and Site Index, respectively. Productivity predicted from these surfaces for the entire plantation estate averaged 27.4 m³ ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ for the 300 Index and 30.4 m for Site Index. Surfaces showed wide regional variation in this productivity, which was attributable mainly to variation in air temperature and root-zone water storage from site to site.
      Date
      2010
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      New Zealand Institute of Forestry
      Rights
      This article has been published in the journal: New Zealand Journal of Forestry. Used with permission.
      Collections
      • Science and Engineering Papers [3122]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      43
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement