dc.contributor.author | Chevalier-Watts, Juliet | en_NZ |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-21T22:08:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011 | en_NZ |
dc.date.available | 2015-10-21T22:08:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.citation | Chevalier-Watts, J. (2011). Military operations and the right to life: the uneasy bedfellows. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 5(2), 207–232. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1783-7014 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10289/9689 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores the challenges facing the European Court of Human Rights in relation to a High Contracting Party's right to deploy the military as a resull of insurgent or terrorist activity, and the obligations under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), concerning the right to life, that were imposed on High Contracting Parties as a result of ratifying the Convention. In considering these challenges, this article addresses firstly the ground-breaking case of McCann and Others v United Kingdom, and then focuses on the jurisprudence arising out of right to life cases brought against firstly Turkey and then Russia as a result of military operations, which have been heavily influenced by the case of McCann. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Intersentia | en_NZ |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.hrild.org/ | |
dc.rights | © 2011 Intersentia. Used with permission. | |
dc.title | Military operations and the right to life: the uneasy bedfellows | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Human Rights and International Legal Discourse | en_NZ |
pubs.begin-page | 207 | |
pubs.elements-id | 37421 | |
pubs.end-page | 232 | |
pubs.issue | 2 | en_NZ |
pubs.volume | 5 | en_NZ |