<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-26T03:29:48Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz:10289/14043" metadataPrefix="dim">https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz:10289/14043</identifier><datestamp>2021-01-06T20:25:10Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10289_2222</setSpec><setSpec>col_10289_2223</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Spell, Chester S.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">O'Driscoll, Michael P.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Haar, Jarrod M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2021-01-06T20:11:28Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2021-01-06T20:11:28Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2002</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="updated">2021-01-06T20:10:36Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="citation" lang="en">Haar, J. M. (2002). Examining work-family practice use and employee attitudes in a New Zealand local government organisation (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/14043</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/10289/14043</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Work-family practices have proliferated in response to major changes in the workplace, including the increased participation rates of women and mothers, the rise in dual-career families and single parent families, and growth in the elderly population. These changes are seen as providing employees help in balancing work and family commitments. Work-family policies are purported to offer benefits to both employers and employees, for example reduced turnover, increased organisational commitment and greater job satisfaction.&#xd;
&#xd;
The major focus of the present study was employee use of multiple work-family policies, as the majority of the work-family literature focuses upon single practices. The present study sought to examine the relationship between work-family practice use and work-family conflict, to determine whether work-family practices link with conflict. Also, in response to a failure of the literature in explaining the link between work-family policy use and employee attitudes, the present study used social exchange theory and the norm of reciprocity to better explain the relationship. The present study also use a set of organisational justice theories to examine perceptions of the fairness of work-family policies, and the link these perceptions may have with general employee attitudes. Also, for exploring work-family backlash, where the distribution of rewards suggests work-family non-users may hold negative attitudes compared to users.&#xd;
&#xd;
A single local government organisation, with 203 employees, was the focus of this study. Surveys were distributed at two distinct time periods to reduce common method variance. A total of 100 paired survey responses were received. Findings supported a positive relationship between work-family practices and conflict between work and home, in both directions. Additionally, work → family conflict was associated with decreased job satisfaction and increased work strain. Findings also indicated that work-family practice use predicted work-family specific attitudes but not attitudes towards the job and organisation. Work-family practice use and perceived benefits of work-family programmes predicted fairness perceptions, however, fairness perceptions failed to predict attitudes towards the organisation and job. Lastly, there was no evidence of a work-family backlash, with users and non-users holding similar attitudes towards the work-family programmes, organisation and job.&#xd;
&#xd;
Implications include the need for examining the causal nature of the work-family practice and conflict relationship, caution regarding the assumption that work-family policies are automatically beneficial, and encouragement for organisations to proactively test their work-family programmes. Lastly, the lack of a work-family backlash suggests media sensationalism, and, therefore, as non-users are not likely to hold negative attitudes towards the organisation, work-family backlash should not be seen as discouraging organisational adoption of work-family programmes.&#xd;
&#xd;
Contributions of this research include the examination of multiple work-family practices, which is rare, and the elucidation of the work-family conflict – work-family practice use relationship, which is poorly understood. Theorising the influence that work-family practices have upon employee attitudes is another contribution. While the findings indicated no significant link between general attitudes and practice use, this might highlight a methodological limitation in examining practice use, rather than practice value or frequency of use. Lastly, this thesis indicates that work-family practices do link in multiple ways with employee attitudes under multiple theoretical approaches.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">The University of Waikato</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">All items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Examining work-family practice use and employee attitudes in a New Zealand local government organisation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="grantor">The University of Waikato</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="level">Doctoral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="pubs" element="place-of-publication" lang="en_NZ">Hamilton, New Zealand</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>