<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-26T13:44:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz:10289/2646" metadataPrefix="dim">https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz:10289/2646</identifier><datestamp>2017-12-08T00:47:44Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10289_2222</setSpec><setSpec>col_10289_2223</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_NZ">Messick, Eric Michael</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2007-05-18T19:24:49Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2007-05-23T12:26:39Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_NZ">2007</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="citation" lang="en">Messick, E. M. (2007). Behavioural Economics: The Inferior-Good Effect (Thesis, Master of Philosophy (MPhil)). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/2646</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/10289/2646</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_NZ">These experiments used 15 domestic hens to investigate the inferior-good effect, a decrease in consumption of a commodity as income increases.  Experiment 1 investigated plain and salted wheat to serve as superior goods (opposite to inferior goods) and inferior goods.  Hens consumed mostly plain wheat when given ad-libitum access so it was the intended superior good and salted wheat was the intended inferior good.  In the next experiments, 3 s of plain wheat and 10 s of salted wheat were available for single responses on 2 keys during discrete trials.  Income changed by changing the inter-trial interval (ITI) of fixed-length sessions or the total number of trials.  Experiment 2 partially replicated the Silberberg et al. (1987) procedure, using the ITI income analogue for 6 hens.  When income increased, 4 hens sometimes responded less on the salted-wheat key (demonstrating the inferior-good effect), 2 of these hens and a 5th hen sometimes responded more on both keys but proportionally more on the plain-wheat key (termed here as a relative inferior-good effect).  Experiment 3a partially replicated the Hastjarjo et al. (1990a) procedure using the total-trials analogue for 7 other hens.  The inferior-good effect occurred across some conditions for 2 hens while other hens tended to respond on the plain-wheat key, suggesting lack of contingency contact.  When a 60-s ITI was added in Experiment 3b, variability increased for most hens, but only 1 hen showed the effect, 1 of the hens that did so in Experiment 3b.  These 6 hens' (1 died) 80% bodyweights were re-assessed in Experiment 4 and hens were below 80% during Experiments 3a and 3b, suggesting that the lack of the inferior-good effect was not due to some hens being at high weights.  The ITI analogue was used for these 6 hens in Experiment 5 and the effect occurred for 2 hens.  Experiment 6 added forced-choice trials to the total-trials analogue (with 60-s ITI) to guarantee contingency contact.  The inferior- and/or relative-inferior-good effect occurred for 3 hens.  Across Experiments 2 through 6, body weights were usually heavier in high-income conditions and a within-session pattern of early-salted-late-plain responding occasionally occurred.   Crop capacities  of 5 Experiment-2 hens and a new hen (1 died) were assessed in Experiment 7 and there was no relation between this measure and inferior-or relative-inferior-good effects.  Experiments 8 and 9 examined effects of pre- and post-feed in low-income conditions using the ITI analogue.  When hens were pre-fed, responding for 5 of 7 hens resembled responding in high-income conditions of Experiment 2 with more plain-wheat responding and similar or less salted-wheat responding in some conditions (behaviour similar to the inferior- and relative-inferior-good effects, but without the income change).  A similar pattern was found for 4 of 5 hens when hens were post-fed in Experiment 9, suggesting that food in the digestive tract may have played a role, and perhaps not the income manipulations themselves, where it (or other component of body weight) may have abolished quantity (i.e., the intended-inferior-good) as a reinforcer.  Although these experiments occasionally demonstrated inferior- and relative-inferior-good effects, but less convincingly than published studies, the effects of income may have been non-specific.  The usefulness of the inferior-good concept and other income-related economic concepts are thus challenged.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_NZ">The University of Waikato</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">All items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">behavioural economics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">inferior good</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">income</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">choice</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">consumption</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">body weight</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">crop</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_NZ">gallus domesticus</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_NZ">Behavioural Economics: The Inferior-Good Effect</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_NZ">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="grantor" lang="en_NZ">University of Waikato</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="level">Doctoral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name" lang="en_NZ">Master of Philosophy (MPhil)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="uow" element="date" qualifier="accession" lang="en_NZ">2007-05-18T19:24:49Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="uow" element="date" qualifier="available" lang="en_NZ">2007-05-23T12:26:39Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="uow" element="date" qualifier="migrated" lang="en_NZ">2009-06-12T04:48:58Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="uow" element="identifier" qualifier="adt" lang="en_NZ">http://adt.waikato.ac.nz/public/adt-uow20070518.192449</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="pubs" element="place-of-publication" lang="en_NZ">Hamilton, New Zealand</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>