Oladi, SanaUiga, LiisHébert-Losier, KimMasters, Rich SW2025-10-152025-10-152022Oladi, S., Uiga, L., Hebert-Losier, K., & Masters, R. S. W. (2022). Testing the efficacy of a motor analogy designed to promote safe landing by older adults who fall accidentally: a study protocol for a randomised control study. BMJ Open, 12(8), e060144-e060144. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-0601442044-6055https://hdl.handle.net/10289/17717Introduction: Falling is associated with adverse effects on the health of older people. The majority of research into falls among older people has focused on prevention, with less attention to ‘how to fall safely’. Previous research suggests that motor analogies can be used to promote safe landing by young adults; however, the efficacy of this technique for older people remains unknown. This study aims to determine whether a motor analogy is useful for promoting safe falling in the older adult population. Methods and analysis: The study adopts a randomised, controlled, single- blinded study design. People 65 years and older will be randomly allocated to a control condition or a motor analogy condition. They will receive a nudge in a forward, backward or sideways direction (randomised order), which will initiate a fall. The nudge will occur at variable (randomised) time points, so participants will not be aware of when they will fall. Participants in the motor analogy condition will be instructed to ‘land like a feather’, whereas participants in the control condition will be instructed to ‘land safely’. The primary outcome parameters are maximum impact force (normalised by mass) applied to different body segments during impact and fracture risk ratio of wrists and hips. A two- way multivariate analysis of variance will be conducted to examine differences between the motor analogy and control conditions as a function of the different variables.enAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Journal Article10.1136/bmjopen-2021-0601442044-60554203 Health Services and Systems42 Health Sciences32 Biomedical and clinical sciences42 Health sciences52 Psychology