Siu, Oi LingLu, Jia-fangBrough, PaulaLu, Chang-QinBakker, Arnold B.Kalliath, ThomasO’Driscoll, Michael P.Phillips, David R.Chen, Wei-qingLo, DannySit, CindyShi, Kan2010-07-302010-07-302010Siu, O., Lu, J., Brough, P., Lu, C., Bakker, A.B., Kalliath, T., …, Shi, K. (2010). Role resources and work-family enrichment: The role of work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior.https://hdl.handle.net/10289/4220The majority of work-family research has focused on negative spillover between demands and outcomes and between the work and family domains (e.g., work-family conflict; see review by Eby, Casper, Lockwood, Bordeaux, & Brinley, 2005). The theory that guided this research was in most cases role stress theory (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985) or the role scarcity hypothesis (Edwards & Rothbard, 2000). However, according to spillover theory, work-related activities and satisfaction also affect non-work performance, and vice versa. Recently, in line with the positive psychology movement (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000), work-family interaction research has also included concepts of positive spillover (Bakker & Schaufeli, 2008; Grzywacz & Marks, 2000). This emerging focus supplements the dominant conflict perspective by identifying new ways of cultivating human resource strength.application/pdfenThis is an author’s accepted version of an article published in the journal: Journal of Vocational Behavior. © 2010 Elsevier.work-familyJournal Article10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.007