Tan, Kyle K. H.Waitoki, WaikaremoanaScarf, DamianPhillips, Justin Bonest2025-05-212025-05-212025Tan, K., Waitoki, M., Scarf, D., & Phillips, J. (2025). Problematic reasoning under the guise of anti-Māori talk: A case study of the Three Waters tweets. Howard Journal of Communications, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2025.25065651064-6175https://hdl.handle.net/10289/17386Drawing from a subset of Twitter/X quotes (or tweets) on the politically controversial Three Waters Reform, this study identified forms of anti-Māori discourse through a deductive analysis. A complementary analysis was conducted to unpack how problematic reasoning fueled racism against Māori. Our results revealed distinct and interconnected themes—“resources,” “culture,” “stirrer,” “privilege,” and “one people”—that portrayed Māori as undeserving, lacking expertise, threatening, and unworthy of equitable treatment, as New Zealand citizens are entitled to enjoy liberal democratic values. Anti-Māori speakers employed problematic reasoning tactics to obstruct the public from understanding the truth or to encourage others to form ill-informed opinions through emotions, supposed authority, and conspiracy. Exemplar tweets were provided to illustrate the myriad instances of false information related to patterns of anti-Māori discourse. Evidence from this study makes the case for addressing racism on social media and creating interventions to expand media literacy amongst the public to discern problematic reasonings.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Journal Article10.1080/10646175.2025.25065651096-46494701 Communication and Media Studies47 Language, Communication and Culture4701 Communication and media studies