Tompson, LisaJolliffe Simpson, AprielWortley, Richard2026-02-182026-02-182026-01-27Tompson, L., Jolliffe Simpson, A., & Wortley, R. (2026). Understanding poly-victimisation through an intersectional lens. Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/263380762514094192633-8076https://hdl.handle.net/10289/17942Compared to the well-established phenomenon of repeat victimisation (experiencing the same crime type repeatedly), poly-victimisation (experiencing multiple crime types) is poorly understood. We argue that advancing understanding of poly-victimisation requires focusing on characteristics that transcend single crime events; the time-stable “flags” that explain why some people experience victimisation across contexts. Given the significant impact of poly-victimisation on wellbeing, this study aims to inform crime prevention policies by identifying personal characteristics associated with poly-victimisation risk within a 12-month period in Aotearoa New Zealand. We used binary logistic regression and Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations (CACC) to examine responses to the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey. Poly-victimisation risk was rarely attributable to a single characteristic but was instead shaped by interactions between them. Consistent with prior studies, psychological distress frequently co-occurred with poly-victimisation, highlighting that victimisation often affects those least equipped to endure it. The case-oriented approach of CACC can provide critical insights into the complex risk dynamics associated with victimisation. Identifying and supporting poly-victims requires targeted interventions that recognise the cumulative impact of multiple vulnerabilities on victimisation risk.enCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Understanding poly-victimisation through an intersectional lensJournal Article10.1177/263380762514094192633-808448 Law and Legal Studies4805 Legal Systems4402 Criminology44 Human Society4402 Criminology4804 Law in context4805 Legal systems16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions