Welcome to Research Commons

Research Commons is the University of Waikato's open access research repository, housing research publications and theses produced by the University's staff and students.

Communities in Research Commons

Select a community to browse its collections.

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Recent Submissions

The Pacific Archaeology Radiocarbon Database
(Wiley, 2025-07-29) Bickler, Simon; Petchey, Fiona; Bickler, Gideon; Mulrooney, Mara; Rieth, Timothy; Jennings, Richard; Bunbury, Magdalena
This paper describes the Pacific Archaeology Radiocarbon Database (PARD), which includes radiocarbon data from archaeological sites excavated in an area commonly described as Near and Remote Oceania. The collated 14C database is available using ArcGIS Online, an online geospatial system with searchable fields and locational navigation. The online PARD currently has over 17,000 radiocarbon measurements from archaeological sites from over 300 islands in the Pacific. The database contains many inconsistencies reflecting the long history of radiocarbon dating in the Pacific and issues relating to date calculation, precision, contamination removal, in-built age, and contextual uncertainty. While ‘chronometric hygiene’ protocols have demonstrated the reasons for treating such radiocarbon ages with caution, the presence of these data can still provide important information. The location of early excavations, distribution of site types at certain broad time periods, and other such information are useful in providing frameworks for future research. The PARD is a valuable starting point for researchers and communities in the Pacific. It has the potential to assist researchers in coordinating site location data for excavations and promises to aid a more extensive investigation of key research themes. The accessibility of the data online allows stakeholders, particularly indigenous groups across the Pacific, to improve their access to and understanding of the value of archaeological research. Cet article décrit la base de données radiocarbone archéologique du Pacifique (PARD), qui comprend des données radiocarbone provenant de sites archéologiques fouillés en Océanie proche et lointaine. La base de données 14C compilée est accessible via ArcGIS Online. La PARD en ligne contient actuellement plus de 17,000 mesures radiocarbone provenant de sites archéologiques de centaines d'îles du Pacifique La localisation de fouilles la répartition par types de site, grande période et autres fournissent un cadre utile pour de futures recherches. Les données de localisation de sites clés pourraient permettre de réalisation d’études plus approfondies.
Ūloa: Rethinking mental health provision in Pacific Island communities
(Research Features, 2025) Vaka, Sione
Modern mental health services fail to effectively cater for migrant Pacific Island communities, which have different worldviews and ways of knowing. At the University of Waikato, Associate Professor Sione Vaka has developed the ūloa model of care, which draws inspiration from traditional research methods and ways of life. The ūloa model offers Pacific-centred mental health services with cultural appropriateness and equitable outcomes.
Legal jurisdictions in a digital age: Challenges and opportunities in Parliamentary oversight of social media platforms
(Australasian Study of Parliament Group (ASPG), 2025) Tan, Rachel Sue Yin
This article explores the challenges and opportunities of legal jurisdictions in the digital age, focusing on parliamentary oversight of social media platforms. The Christchurch shootings in New Zealand highlighted the internet's role in distributing harmful content, underscoring the need for effective regulation. Similarly, the potential TikTok ban in the US demonstrates the complexities of addressing national security concerns, data privacy, and foreign influence through legislative action. This article examines the Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime and principles of sovereignty, comity, and non-intervention to highlight the evolving landscape of internet jurisdiction. It also emphasises the importance of balancing national laws with international standards to ensure fair and effective regulation.
The elephant in the room: Precarious work in New Zealand’s universities
(University of Auckland, 2022) Simpson, Aimee B.; Jolliffe Simpson, Apriel D.; Soar, Max; Oldfield, Luke; Roy, Rituparna; Salter, Leon A.
Precarious working arrangements, defined by temporary casual and fixed-term employment agreements, are a complex, often hidden feature of academia in Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa hereafter). At present, little is known about the conditions of insecure academic work, the size of this workforce, nor how these workers have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This report provides an insight into the reality of insecure academic work in universities from those who responded to the 2021 Precarious Academic Work Survey. We highlight that in Aotearoa we have a highly trained, casual and fixed-term academic workforce who are engaged in long-term cycles of precarity. Among the 760 participants surveyed, more than one-quarter (28.9%) had been precariously employed for five years or longer. Further, nearly sixty percent (59.2%) had accepted extra work to support themselves or their whānau, even when it jeopardised their other responsibilities (e.g., completing their degrees). Over half (52.7%) of all students, and nearly two-thirds (64.4%) of PhD students surveyed, had held three or more employment agreements at a university in the last 12 months. Financial need (71.6%) was most frequently cited as an important factor in participants’ decisions to engage in precarious work, and over half (52.4%) of participants experienced a rise in their living costs due to working from home during the pandemic. Our report also adds further evidence of inequities present in the academic pipeline. Just one in ten Māori (10.8%) and one in thirteen Pasifika (7.7%) participants were PhD graduates, a smaller proportion than the nearly one-third (31.5%) of New Zealand European/Pākehā. Over two-thirds (66.8%) of international students indicated they were employed in the most insecure forms (Casual or fixed-term contracts of six months or less) of precarious work, compared with 60.5% of domestic students. Of those precarious workers completing a PhD, domestic students in our survey were far more likely to be receiving a stipend (73.9%) compared to international students (50%). Further, 63.2% of participants who were international students without a stipend reported that they lacked confidence in having sufficient ongoing academic work in the next 12 months. Instances of discrimination, bullying, and harassment were also reported by survey participants, with 33.7% citing that they had been impacted by such issues. Other workplace safety concerns were evident: nearly half of participants (45.7%) described their workloads as always or often unsustainable and negatively impacting their health and wellbeing. Meanwhile, one-quarter (23.9%) of precarious staff rated their current stress level as an eight, on a scale of zero (no stress) to ten (completely stressed). Two-thirds (66.3%) of participants were not confident they would receive adequate support from their employer in the event of a future crisis (e.g., a natural disaster or outbreak of infectious disease). On this basis, we encourage universities to do better for their casual and fixed-term employees through increasing job security, reducing inequities for Māori and Pasifika precarious staff, and improving conditions for postgraduate students, both domestic and international. In our final recommendations, we implore the government to work alongside universities to realise this change by investigating workloads, increasing, and rebalancing sector funding, and reinstating the postgraduate student allowance.
The Geographic Classification for Health: Methodology and classification report
(Otago University, 2021) Whitehead, Jesse; Davie, Gabrielle; de Graaf, Brandon; Crengle, Sue; Smith, Michelle; Lawrenson, Ross; Fearnley, Dave; Farrell, Noella; Nixon, Garry
The GCH is based on population and drive time data that was used in the development of the Urban Accessibility (UA) classification (Statistics New Zealand, 2020). The UA is in turn based on the Statistical Standard for Geographic Areas 2018 (SSGA18) which includes the urban rural 2018 (UR2018) classification (Statistics New Zealand, 2018). The authors of this report have applied a framework to the UA classification that considers a health services discourse to determine appropriate population and drive time thresholds. We have tested both the quantitative and ‘on-the-ground’ validity of the GCH, in partnership with the Ministry of Health’s National Rural Health Advisory Group (NRHAG). The GCH is comprised of five categories, two urban and three rural, that reflect degrees of reducing urban influence and increasing rurality. The GCH applies these categories to all of New Zealand’s Statistical Area 1s (SA1s, small statistical areas which are the output geography for population data) on a scale from ‘Urban 1’ to ‘Urban 2’ based on population size, and from “Rural 1’ to ‘Rural 3’ based on drive time to their closest major, large, medium, and small* (*As defined in the Statistical Standard for Geographic Areas 2018 (Statistics New Zealand, 2018)) urban areas. Like the UA, the GCH is based on population size and density, with drive time used to indicate increasing rurality. Unlike the UA, which is a generic classification, the population and drive time thresholds used in the GCH have been developed from a health perspective, in consultation with more than 300 individuals from 20 organisations. The nature of the functional relationships between urban areas and rural surrounds have also been considered through a health lens. In this paper we discuss concepts and issues with previous ‘generic’ urban-rural classifications being used in health research in Aotearoa New Zealand. We also describe the GCH methodology and classification, discuss limitations, and illustrate the GCH with maps.