Publication:
Responsibilities and funding – consenting pathways and options

dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Angus
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T09:04:52Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T09:04:52Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThis presentation will outline the regulatory framework for biosecurity programmes within the Rotorua Lakes and explore a range of potential options for tackling the framework, drawing on my experiences with collaborative comprehensive consenting and national policy tools. Examples to be discussed will include: · National aquatic weed consent. A multi-agency reassessment that has expanded the aquatic weed toolkit under HSNO and provided efficiencies through reducing administration costs. · Comprehensive consenting in the Waikato region. Programme level consents for the Waikato Regional Council, their effectiveness, outcomes and relevance to the Rotorua Lakes context. These examples showcase a range of alternative responses to regulatory requirements that have resulted in positive outcomes for the agencies involved and could provide a framework for the Rotorua Lakes programmes.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/15143
dc.publisherLakesWater Quality Societyen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProceedings of LakesWater Quality Society 2015en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttps://lakeswaterquality.co.nz/symposia/en_NZ
dc.rights© 2015 LakesWater Quality Society.en_NZ
dc.titleResponsibilities and funding – consenting pathways and optionsen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contributionen_NZ
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNDING.pdf
Size:
508.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: