An eco-profile of thermoplastic protein derived from blood meal Part 1: allocation issues

dc.contributor.authorBier, James Michael
dc.contributor.authorVerbeek, Casparus Johan R.
dc.contributor.authorLay, Mark C.
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-09T21:00:28Z
dc.date.available2013-01-09T21:00:28Z
dc.date.copyright2012-02-10
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractPurpose A renewable thermoplastic called Novatein Thermoplastic Protein (NTP) has been developed from blood meal—a low-value by-product of the meat processing industry. The aim of this research was to develop a non-renewable energy and greenhouse gas emission eco-profile for cradle to gate production of NTP. Environmental impacts of supplying blood meal as a raw material were investigated using different allocation methods for farming and blood meal production. These included mass, economic, treating low-value by-products as waste and system expansion by substitution. In part 2, the entire system will be analysed on a cradle to gate basis and include the production of thermoplastic (NTP). Methods A theoretical NTP production facility was analysed for non-renewable primary energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Data for feedstocks and process steps were obtained from published papers, government agency reports and engineering models. Mass and economic allocation models treating low-value by-products as waste and substitution were applied, and a sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the impact of different methods of allocation on environmental impact. Results and discussion Non-renewable energy use in blood meal production varied between 5 (substitution) and 38 MJ (simple mass allocation) per kg of NTP. Greenhouse gas emissions varied between 0.4 (substitution), or even less if the biogenic carbon content is considered a credit, and 14 kg (mass allocation) CO2e per kg NTP. Conclusions It was concluded that both mass allocation and a waste assumption should be considered for the cradle to gate system. Mass allocation is common in other attributional studies and allows for a more transparent comparison. The most appropriate treatment of allocation in an attributional profile was to consider blood as a waste with regard to farming and meat processing, but include blood drying. This takes into account the motivations for farming and meat processing, but also recognises that there are other treatment options for blood that do not produce blood meal used in manufacturing NTP. This would allow NTP to be compared to other bioplastics as well as identifying hot spots in its cradle to gate production. It was also anticipated that results may be adapted in future cradle to grave assessments as product systems are developed.en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationBier, J. M., Verbeek, C. J. R., & Lay, M. C. (2012). An eco-profile of thermoplastic protein derived from blood meal Part 1: allocation issues. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(2), 208-219.en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11367-011-0349-8en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn1614-7502
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/7005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringeren_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessmenten_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
dc.subjectAllocationen_NZ
dc.subjectBio-based materialsen_NZ
dc.subjectBioplasticen_NZ
dc.subjectBiopolymeren_NZ
dc.subjectBlood mealen_NZ
dc.subjectCradle to gateen_NZ
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_NZ
dc.titleAn eco-profile of thermoplastic protein derived from blood meal Part 1: allocation issuesen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dspace.entity.typePublication
pubs.begin-page208en_NZ
pubs.end-page219en_NZ
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.volume17en_NZ

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: