Comparison of Personal Video Technology for Teaching and Assessment of Surgical Skills.

dc.contributor.authorSheahan, Guyen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorReznick, Richarden_NZ
dc.contributor.authorKlinger, Donen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Leslieen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorZevin, Borisen_NZ
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Statesen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T01:39:42Z
dc.date.available2023-11-30T01:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-06en_NZ
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Improvements in personal technology have made video recording for teaching and assessment of surgical skills possible. OBJECTIVE: This study compared 5 personal video-recording devices based on their utility (image quality, hardware, mounting options, and accessibility) in recording open surgical procedures. METHODS: Open procedures in a simulated setting were recorded using smartphones and tablets (MOB), laptops (LAP), sports cameras such as GoPro (SC), single-lens reflex cameras (DSLR), and spy camera glasses (SPY). Utility was rated by consensus between 2 investigators trained in observation of technology using a 5-point Likert scale (1, poor, to 5, excellent). RESULTS: A total of 150 hours of muted video were reviewed with a minimum 1 hour for each device. Image quality was good (3.8) across all devices, although this was influenced by the device-mounting requirements (4.2) and its proximity to the area of interest. Device hardware (battery life and storage capacity) was problematic for long procedures (3.8). Availability of devices was high (4.2). CONCLUSIONS: Personal video-recording technology can be used for assessment and teaching of open surgical skills. DSLR and SC provide the best images. DSLR provides the best zoom capability from an offset position, while SC can be placed closer to the operative field without impairing sterility. Laptops provide best overall utility for long procedures due to video file size. All devices require stable recording platforms (eg, bench space, dedicated mounting accessories). Head harnesses (SC, SPY) provide opportunities for "point-of-view" recordings. MOB and LAP can be used for multiple concurrent recordings.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.4300/JGME-D-18-01082.1en_NZ
dc.identifier.eissn1949-8357en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/16217
dc.language.isoengen_NZ
dc.publisherNational Library of Medicine
dc.relation.isPartOfJ Grad Med Educen_NZ
dc.rights© 2019. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
dc.rights.urihttps://meridian.allenpress.com/jgme/pages/About-the-Journal
dc.subjectClinical Competenceen_NZ
dc.subjectComputers, Handhelden_NZ
dc.subjectEducation, Medicalen_NZ
dc.subjectGeneral Surgeryen_NZ
dc.subjectHumansen_NZ
dc.subjectPhotographyen_NZ
dc.subjectSmartphoneen_NZ
dc.subjectStudents, Medicalen_NZ
dc.subjectVideo Recordingen_NZ
dc.titleComparison of Personal Video Technology for Teaching and Assessment of Surgical Skills.en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
pubs.begin-page328
pubs.end-page331
pubs.issue3en_NZ
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.volume11en_NZ

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sheehan et al i1949-8357-11-3-328.pdf
Size:
173.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Research Commons Deposit Agreement 2017.pdf
Size:
188.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections