Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorMoore, A.W.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Anthony Jamesen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBreen, J.W.en_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-22T23:27:16Z
dc.date.available1996en_NZ
dc.date.available2016-05-22T23:27:16Z
dc.date.issued1996en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationMoore, A. W., McGregor, A. J., & Breen, J. W. (1996). A comparison of system monitoring methods, passive network monitoring and kernel instrumentation. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 30(1), 16–38. http://doi.org/10.1145/218646.218648en
dc.identifier.issn0163-5980en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/10255
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the comparison of two methods of system monitoring, passive network monitoring and kernel instrumentation. The comparison is made on the basis of passive network monitoring being used as a replacement for kernel instrumentation in some situations. Despite the fact that the passive network monitoring technique is shown to perform poorly as a direct replacement for kernel instrumentation, this paper indicates the areas where passive network monitoring could be used to the greatest advantage and presents methods by which the discrepancies between results of the two techniques could be minimised.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherACMen_NZ
dc.rightsThis is an author’s accepted version of an article published in the journal: ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. © 1996 ACM.
dc.titleA comparison of system monitoring methods, passive network monitoring and kernel instrumentationen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/218646.218648en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Reviewen_NZ
pubs.begin-page16
pubs.elements-id83819
pubs.end-page38
pubs.issue1en_NZ
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/FCMS
pubs.volume30en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record