Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      How does voluntary ethics improve research? Introducing a community research development initiative

      Flanagan, Paul G.; Tumilty, Emma
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Flanagan & Tumilty 2015 Whanake 1(2).pdf
      Supporting information, 2.025Mb
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Flanagan, P., & Tumilty, E. (2015). How does voluntary ethics improve research? Introducing a community research development initiative. Whanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Development, 1(2), 1–10.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10879
      Abstract
      Until recently, community organisations in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) have not had any avenue for ethical review of research involving human participants unless they were connected to researchers involved with health and disability research (narrowly-defined), or tertiary education institutions. The New Zealand Ethics Committee (NZEC), a recent community research development initiative, has invited organisations to submit their proposals for voluntary ethics review and provides research methodology support where sought. This paper introduces this initiative, describing both its make-up and processes. It also explores the relationship between reviewer-applicant in the NZEC as distinctive to the relationship of reviewer-applicant in traditional ethical review settings, explaining this difference of power relations and philosophy. Those in the community see research ethics review as something to be learned along with research methodology/practice.
      Date
      2015
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      ePress, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
      Rights
      This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
      Collections
      • Education Papers [1416]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      66
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement