Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Education
      • Education Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Re-configuring and deterritorializing subject↔object relations in education

      Tesar, Marek; Arndt, Sonja Kathrina
      Thumbnail
      Files
      8646351-20243-2-PB.pdf
      Published version, 607.4Kb
      DOI
       10.20396/etd.v18i3.8646351
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Tesar, M., & Arndt, S. K. (2016). Re-configuring and deterritorializing subject↔object relations in education. ETD - Educação Temática Digital, 18(3), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.20396/etd.v18i3.8646351
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11353
      Abstract
      For many years in the 20th Century, Western thinking in education has been defined against the background of Cartesian dualisms, both with respect to philosophy and methodology. And it was this Cartesian thinking, the separation of the discursive and material, and the elevation of the philosophy of the subject, the human I, that gave birth to the postmodern era, and in recent years, to the notions that we tend to call new materialisms and post-humanisms. And it was modernity and its ruins, that gave birth to the re-writing of the human self, and of subject↔object relations. As cultural critic Greenberg (1973) argues: “the essence of Modernism lies in the use of characteristic methods of a discipline to criticize the discipline itself, not in order to subvert it but in order to entrench it more firmly in its area of competence. Immanuel Kant used logic to establish the limits of logic, and while he withdrew much from its old jurisdiction, logic was left all the more secure in what there remained to it” (p. 66).
      Date
      2016
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Journal Educação Temática Digital
      Rights
      This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
      Collections
      • Education Papers [1411]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      77
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement