Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorPochon, Xavieren_NZ
dc.contributor.authorZaiko, Anastasijaen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Lauren M.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLaroche, Olivieren_NZ
dc.contributor.authorWood, Susanna A.en_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T02:46:00Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T02:46:00Z
dc.date.issued2017en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationPochon X, Zaiko A, Fletcher LM, Laroche O, Wood SA (2017) Wanted dead or alive? Using metabarcoding of environmental DNA and RNA to distinguish living assemblages for biosecurity applications. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0187636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187636
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/13824
dc.description.abstractHigh-throughput sequencing metabarcoding studies in marine biosecurity have largely focused on targeting environmental DNA (eDNA). DNA can persist extracellularly in the environment, making discrimination of living organisms difficult. In this study, bilge water samples (i.e., water accumulating on-board a vessel during transit) were collected from 15 small recreational and commercial vessels. eDNA and eRNA molecules were co-extracted and the V4 region of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene targeted for metabarcoding. In total, 62.7% of the Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were identified at least once in the corresponding eDNA and eRNA reads, with 19.5% unique to eDNA and 17.7% to eRNA. There were substantial differences in diversity between molecular compartments; 57% of sequences from eDNA-only OTUs belonged to fungi, likely originating from legacy DNA. In contrast, there was a higher percentage of metazoan (50.2%) and ciliate (31.7%) sequences in the eRNA-only OTUs. Our data suggest that the presence of eRNA-only OTUs could be due to increased cellular activities of some rare taxa that were not identified in the eDNA datasets, unusually high numbers of rRNA transcripts in ciliates, and/or artefacts produced during the reverse transcriptase, PCR and sequencing steps. The proportions of eDNA/eRNA shared and unshared OTUs were highly heterogeneous within individual bilge water samples. Multiple factors including boat type and the activities performed on-board, such as washing of scientific equipment, may play a major role in contributing to this variability. For some marine biosecurity applications analysis, eDNA-only data may be sufficient, however there are an increasing number of instances where distinguishing the living portion of a community is essential. For these circumstances, we suggest only including OTUs that are present in both eDNA and eRNA data. OTUs found only in the eRNA data need to be interpreted with caution until further research provides conclusive evidence for their origin.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherPublic Library Scienceen_NZ
dc.rights© 2017 Pochon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_NZ
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary Sciencesen_NZ
dc.subjectScience & Technology - Other Topicsen_NZ
dc.subjectBALLAST WATERen_NZ
dc.subjectEXTRACELLULAR DNAen_NZ
dc.subjectRISK-ASSESSMENTen_NZ
dc.subjectRIBOSOMAL-RNAen_NZ
dc.subjectBIODIVERSITYen_NZ
dc.subjectCOMMUNITIESen_NZ
dc.subjectRAREen_NZ
dc.subjectVESSELSen_NZ
dc.subjectIMPACTSen_NZ
dc.subjectSPREADen_NZ
dc.titleWanted dead or alive? Using metabarcoding of environmental DNA and RNA to distinguish living assemblages for biosecurity applicationsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0187636en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfPLoS Oneen_NZ
pubs.declined2020-09-15T14:23:09.139+1200
pubs.elements-id212421
pubs.issue11en_NZ
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.volume12en_NZ
uow.identifier.article-noARTN e0187636


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record