Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Computing and Mathematical Sciences
      • Computing and Mathematical Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Computing and Mathematical Sciences
      • Computing and Mathematical Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Deep learning in diabetic foot ulcers detection: A comprehensive evaluation

      Yap, Moi Hoon; Hachiuma, Ryo; Alavi, Azadeh; Brüngel, Raphael; Cassidy, Bill; Goyal, Manu; Zhu, Hongtao; Rückert, Johannes; Olshansky, Moshe; Huang, Xiao; Saito, Hideo; Hassanpour, Saeed; Friedrich, Christoph M.; Ascher, David B.; Song, Anping; Kajita, Hiroki; Gillespie, David; Reeves, Neil D.; Pappachan, Joseph M.; O'Shea, Claire; Frank, Eibe
      Thumbnail
      Files
      1-s2.0-S0010482521003905-main.pdf
      Published version, 10.57Mb
      DOI
       10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104596
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Yap, M. H., Hachiuma, R., Alavi, A., Brüngel, R., Cassidy, B., Goyal, M., … Frank, E. (2021). Deep learning in diabetic foot ulcers detection: A comprehensive evaluation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 135, 104596–104596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104596
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/14444
      Abstract
      There has been a substantial amount of research involving computer methods and technology for the detection and recognition of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), but there is a lack of systematic comparisons of state-of-the-art deep learning object detection frameworks applied to this problem. DFUC2020 provided participants with a comprehensive dataset consisting of 2,000 images for training and 2,000 images for testing. This paper summarizes the results of DFUC2020 by comparing the deep learning-based algorithms proposed by the winning teams: Faster R–CNN, three variants of Faster R–CNN and an ensemble method; YOLOv3; YOLOv5; EfficientDet; and a new Cascade Attention Network. For each deep learning method, we provide a detailed description of model architecture, parameter settings for training and additional stages including pre-processing, data augmentation and post-processing. We provide a comprehensive evaluation for each method. All the methods required a data augmentation stage to increase the number of images available for training and a post-processing stage to remove false positives. The best performance was obtained from Deformable Convolution, a variant of Faster R–CNN, with a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.6940 and an F1-Score of 0.7434. Finally, we demonstrate that the ensemble method based on different deep learning methods can enhance the F1-Score but not the mAP.
      Date
      2021
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Elsevier BV
      Rights
      © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

      (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
      Collections
      • Computing and Mathematical Sciences Papers [1455]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      387
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement