Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorSehgal, Shekharen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBoucsein, Alisaen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorStyles, Saraen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Octaviaen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Ryan G.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorCrocket, Hamish Roberten_NZ
dc.contributor.authorde Bock, Martinen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Benjamin J.en_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:10:26Z
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:10:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-18en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn0742-3071en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/15972
dc.description.abstractAims: In many countries, real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt- CGM) is not funded, and cost presents a barrier to access. A do-it-yourself conversion of intermittently scanned CGM (DIY- CGM) is a cheaper alternative. This qualitative study aimed to explore user experiences with DIY- CGM in people aged 16 to 69 years with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants for semi-structured virtual interviews exploring experiences of DIY- CGM use. Participants were recruited after completing the intervention arm of a crossover randomised controlled trial that evaluated DIY- CGM versus intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM). Participants were previously naive to DIY- CGM and rt- CGM but not isCGM. The DIY- CGM intervention consisted of a Bluetooth bridge connected to isCGM, adding rt- CGM functionality over 8 weeks. Interviews were transcribed, then thematic analysis was performed. Results: Interviews were with 12 people aged 16 to 65 years, with T1D: mean age ± SD 43 ±14 years; baseline mean HbA1c ± SD 60 mmol/mol ± 9.9 (7.6 ± 0.9%) and time in range 59.8% ± 14.8%. Participants perceived that using DIY- CGM improved both glycaemic control and aspects of quality of life. Alarm and trend functionality allowed participants to perceive reduced glycaemic variability overnight and following meals. The addition of a smartwatch increased discrete access to glucose information. There was a high degree of trust in DIY- CGM. Challenges while using DIY- CGM included signal loss during vigorous exercise, alarm fatigue and short battery life. Conclusions: This study suggests that for users, DIY- CGM appears to be an acceptable alternative method of rt- CGM.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_NZ
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. This is an open-access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
dc.titleDo‐it‐yourself continuous glucose monitoring in people aged 16 to 69 years with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative studyen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dme.15168en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfDiabetic Medicineen_NZ
pubs.elements-id324271


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record