Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Flexibility on whose terms?

      Twiname, Linda J.; Humphries, Maria; Kearins, Kate
      DOI
       10.1108/09534810610668346
      Link
       emeraldinsight.com
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Twiname, L., Humphries, M. & Kearins, K. (2006). Flexibility on whose terms? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(3), 335-355.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/1862
      Abstract
      Purpose – As part of an ongoing project on worker well-being, this paper aims to examine the application of flexible work arrangements through the experiences of core workers in a small, European-owned, New Zealand manufacturing firm.

      Design/methodology/approach – A participatory action research approach is taken.

      Findings – The research reveals that flexible employment arrangements utilised in this firm did not afford protection to core workers as theory suggests. Both core and peripheral workers were exposed to pressure primarily to extend their hours of work and to reduce their expectations regarding remuneration. Production level increases were not reflected in increases in numbers of core workers; in fact perceived job security was low. Core workers felt pressure to work extended hours out of their commitment to the firm, each other, and to maintain their own employment.

      Practical implications – The use of more democratic processes inherent in action research oriented at workplace well-being are shown to have had some value toward enhancing worker well-being.

      Originality/value – The paper demonstrates that the participative project placed pressure upon management and that it had the potential to redress a power imbalance within the employment relationship.
      Date
      2006
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Emerald Group Publishing Limited
      Collections
      • Management Papers [1135]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement