Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorRogers, Priscilla
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Nittaya
dc.contributor.authorLouhiala-salminen, Leena
dc.contributor.authorRentz, Kathy
dc.contributor.authorSuchan, James
dc.identifier.citationRogers, P., Campbell, N., Louhiala-salminen, L., Rentz, K. & Suchan, J. (2007). The impact of perceptions of journal quality on business and management communication academics. Journal of Business Communication, 44(4), 403-426.en
dc.description.abstractThis commentary describes and critiques criteria that, according to results from an Association for Business Communication (ABC) member survey, are having an impact on quality judgments about our journals. ABC members rank the Journal of Business Communication and Business Communication Quarterly as top research and pedagogical journals in business/management communication, a finding corroborated by a larger study of academics in business and technical communication. However, the growing importance of citation counts and journal rankings currently disadvantages our journals, presenting us with professional obligations and personal dilemmas in relation to them. The authors' purpose is to raise awareness of the various determinants of perceptions of journal quality, to explore the communal views of ABC members on this issue, and to seek ways of enhancing the value of business/management communication research in the academic marketplace.en
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_NZ
dc.subjectbusiness and management communication journal rankingsen
dc.subjectjournal quality criteriaen
dc.subjectpromotion and tenureen
dc.titleThe impact of perceptions of journal quality on business and management communication academicsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Business Communicationen_NZ

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record